College and career readiness ( my target group is high school Assignment

College and career readiness ( my target group is superior prepare students) - Assignment ExampleConsequently, many children of black origin had to cover many blocks to attend schools whereas in that respect were schools in their neighborhood but they could not school there since they were whites schools.He goes on to say that, the dogmatic court of United States ruled unanimously that separate educational facilities brought inequalities in the education system in the USA. This was a breakthrough in the fight against racial segregation as well as spread similar cases across the United States as similar cases were filed only over. It also brought to light the injustices that came with segregation as it exposed the fact that the black schools had fewer amenities as compared to the white schools. Attempts were made to protect the school segregation policy, but the browned case was important in the fight against discrimination (Delinder, 2004).The separation of schools was draw i nto place in 1868 when the fourteenth amend was adopted. This was further fortified by the 1896 Plessy V. Fergusson case which ensured that the white and the African American children did not attend the same schools. A change in this system necessitated as was regularize forward by the then (1954) Chief Justice Warren (Delinder 2004).According to Uscourts.gov (n.d) the case that came to be splendidly referred to as Brown Vs Board of Education of Topeka was in fact a group of instances that were to be heard by the Supreme Court of the USA. They were about racial segregation of schools in the USA. These cases included Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel. While all of them had different details all of them had one issue constitutionally state-sponsored racial segregation in public schools.After hearing the case, a three-judge panel ruled against the plaintiffs in fa vor of the education board. Consequently, the plaintiffs appealed to